header image
[ # ] Energy Blog
January 23rd, 2008 under Guest Post

            becka.JPG I’ve often heard it said that sending someone to Congress is kind of like sending your kids off to college: you hope you’ve made the right decision, you hope they don’t fall in with the wrong crowd, and you hope – most of all – to recognize them when they come back.  Kansas has been particularly lucky in this regard of late.  I’m sure we can all one issue or another on which to disagree with Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback, our U.S. Senators.  But on the big things, they usually come through for us, representing not one party but one state.  Politicians may get a bad rap some of the time, but it’s up to us to make note of moments when they do stand and deliver for us.

            Just such a moment arrived last month, and few took much notice.  Since Democrats were elected in the 2006 mid-term elections, speculation – and indeed, some boasting – was heard about Congress finally breaking a log-jam on President Bush’s six-year old call for a new, national energy policy.  Unfortunately, all year more logs just got jammed, as new Congressional leaders insisted on raising taxes on domestic energy companies as part of the comprehensive bill. 

            Many argued, including our two Senators, that taking money away from American gas and oil companies at the very moment we are relying on their research and development projects to finally help reduce our reliance on foreign energy was a bad idea.  They argued, too, that singling out domestic energy companies for the $15 billion tax would effectively act as a subsidy for the very foreign energy we’re trying to avoid.  Congress’s plan was to make our own energy companies less capable of fully funding their research and development budgets, while giving foreign competitors a price advantage in the marketplace.

            Good for Pat Roberts and Sam Brownback for standing up to this lunacy.  We can all agree – and Roberts and Brownback do – that we need to conserve more, and we need to find and experiment with new sources of energy, but we can also agree that sticking it to our own businesses out of spite isn’t the way to go about it.  After all, any taxes raised on energy companies would eventually be passed on to energy consumers – higher prices for gasoline and heating oil just in time for winter.

Furthermore, tax hikes kill jobs, hurt communities, and choke off investment.  Our economy is not a position right now to afford any of the above, especially not in one of the most important industries in our economy.  There’s a right way to do things and a wrong way, and last month, thanks to Kansas’ two Senators, America took the right way.

Beka Romm
Former Chair
KU College Republicans


Write a comment






About
The Dole Institute of Politics is a bipartisan facility. Our mission; to encourage political and civic involvement, especially among young people; to encourage civil discussion on important issues; to emphasize that politics is an honorable profession; and to provide opportunities for all to interact with political leaders, practitioners and writers.

While content on the blog will be moderated, we in no way wish to stifle vigorous debate. We request that participants engaging in the online discussion avoid personal, vitriolic attacks, and maintain respect for different opinions.

David D. Perlmutter, Editor Login

Facts about the Dole Institute

Dole Institute of Politics: A calm place to discuss hot topics

How to find us




Add to Technorati Favorites



Dole Institute Fellows Fall 2008




A Summary of the 2006 Blogger-Reader Survey


Recent Posts
Recent Commentors
Dole Institute in the news
Feature Blog Stories
A Silent Blogging Majority?

Zombietime, Blogs, and the Anti-War Movement

The Boss Is Watching Your Blog!
Research & Reports
“ConfederateYankee Gets an “A+” for Investigative Journalism

“The Great Blog and Fauxtography Debate Continues”

“Photojournalism in Crisis? (The Bloggers Strike!)

“Are Blogs the New Iowa?” (Redux…)

“No Man or Woman Blogs Alone?”

“Are Blogs an Echo Chamber? Do Bloggers Only Read Blogs They Agree With?”

“Blogs as Political Educators”
Blogs & Government
“Live from the Front Lines: The (Blogged) Words of War

“Can the Clintons Harness the Blogs?”

“Political Blogs as ‘Public Domain’ Speechwriters?”

“Blogs and Endorsements”

“Why Politicians Should Blog”

“Blogs, Flogs, Hitblogs, Identity Theft & Politicians: A New Tool for the Dirty Tricks Bag?”

“Blogs of War: Then and Now”

“Blogs, Politicians & ‘The Face in the Crowd’”
Blogs & Public/ Media
“Who are Bloggers? Who Do Bloggers Represent?”

“Washington Post ‘Shuts off Comments’: Big Media’s Troubles in Adapting to Blogging”

“Who was the World’s First Blogger?”

“Are Blogs Feminine?”

“Do Bloggers Wear Political Blinders?”

“Blogs as ‘Scribbling Mercuries’: Marketplace of Ideas or Duel to the Death of Ideas?”

“Bloggers as Local Content Creators”